Serious Problems With Jim Hoffman’s “A Hypothetical Blasting Scenario ” Makes His Recent Essay Far From “Plausable”

by Scott Creighton, from American Everyman

Jim Hoffman has just published his essay ” A Hypothetical Blasting Scenario:  A Plausible Theory Explaining the Controlled Demolition of the Twin Towers Using Aluminothermic Incendiaries and Explosives with Wireless Ignition Means” in time for it to coincide with the new Jones et al piece, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” and quite frankly, Hoffmans work is structurally unsound.

I don’t want to get too far into a critical review of Hoffmans work till I can wrap my head around what Jones’ paper concludes and that is mainly because Hoffman’s efforts are largely based on giving what he thinks is a practical application for the hypothesis of aluminothermic controlled demolition of the Trade Centers.  Clearly understanding more about the new Steven Jones work is key to validating Hoffman’s theory.

I am currently working through the Jones effort as you will see in a moment.

But Hoffman’s “Plausible” theory is a horse of a different color. It would appear that he may have been too eager to get a working demolition theory out there at the same time Jones released his research.

His “Plausible” theory and his conclusions clearly need a lot more work.

Core of Corruption

Open-mindedness

This is a very good video. Keep two things in mind while watching this;

1. People’s unrelenting alliances with political parties,  despite mounting evidence…

2. People’s resistance to even discuss the solid evidence relating to the events of 9/11.

“By Any Means Necessary”

by Scott Creighton reposted from American Everyman

“…That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…”  Declaration of Independence

The time is long since past that our Government has derived just powers or had the consent of the governed. And it’s time we did something about it.

 

BBC Anchor Who Reported on WTC7 Collapse Early Agrees There May Be a ‘Conspiracy’

Members of We Are Change UK questioned ex-BBC reporter Phil Hayton about the early reporting of WTC 7’s collapse during a speaking appearance.

Hayton failed to recollect even being in the studio on the day of 9/11– at first– but then recalls the situation when it is described in detail, including the actions of Jane Standley, who reported the collapse some 26 minutes in advance with WTC Building 7 still visible in the background.

Ahmadinejad Questions 9/11 and the MSM Attacks

by Scott Creighton

(This is going to get ALLOT of press, so let me address this as well.) Apparently Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of Iran, has cast doubts on the official story of what happened on 9/11.

Just three days after Tim Robbins’ inspirational Key Note Addressto the National Association of Broadcasters, MSNBC puts out this story with the sensationalized headline “Iran Casts Doubt on 9/11“. Robbins’ speech was all about bringing ethics, integrity, and truth back into the mix when it comes to network news programing. I guess they weren’t listening.

 

Welcome to Tampa 9/11 Truth’s New Site!

Lot’s of big doins a-goin on!

Site is under construction, and the hard-hats are working on the format!

Bear with us for a day or so, and we will be up and running!

Till then please check out Tampa 9/11 Truth Meetup site.